SOPHISMS. Frédéric. Bastiat. Translated from the French and Edited by. ARTHUR GODDARD. Introduction by. HENRY HAZLITT. Foundation for Economic. Economic Sophisms [Frédéric Bastiat, Arthur Goddard, Henry Hazlitt] on Amazon. com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The essays in Economic Sophisms. Bastiat’s “Economic Sophisms”, translated by Dr. Patrick James Stirling, were eagerly welcomed by students of political economy who were not really familiar.
|Published (Last):||3 January 2004|
|PDF File Size:||18.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The notes of the French editor, likewise enclosed in brackets, appear at the sophisme of the book, where they are labeled merely “Editor,” together with Bastiat’s own notes, which stand without brackets or label.
I referred just now to an imaginary legislative assembly composed of businessmen, in which each member world have the power to enact a law expressing his secret wish in his capacity as a producer; and I said that the laws econommic from such an assembly would create a system of monopoly and put into practice the theory of scarcity.
But one cannot imagine a world with no consumption.
Is it not clear that under these circumstances I should have been better off if these obstacles did not exist in the first place? To maintain that the time will ever come when human labor will lack employment, it would he necessary to prove that mankind will cease to encounter obstacles.
And why does not the fertility of one department nullify the efforts of the sophismms in a neighboring, less favored department? It deserves to be studied in all its forms.
Economic Sophisms – Wikisource, the free online library
Read this short book and you will understand why protectionism and trade barriers are bad for almost everyone.
Thus, carried to its extreme, the policy of econommic is pure Sisyphism, as we have defined it: If it removes one obstacle, it turns to another; and mankind is rid of two obstacles by the same amount of labor that used to be needed to remove only one. We cannot blind wconomic to the fact that certain physical improvements, such as better public sanitation, the development of such moral virtues as moderation and temperance, the progress of knowledge to the point at which everyone can take care of his own health, and the discovery of bastist simple, easily applied remedies, would be just so many deadly blows struck at our profession.
This work was published before January 1,and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least years ago. In so far as we are producers, it must be admitted, each of us has hopes that are antisocial. I confess that the wisdom and the beauty of these laws evoke my admiration and respect. Thus, I was right in saying that every economic phenomenon in the long run diffuses its effects among the consumers, i.
The people, moreover, find their arguments too clear, and why should they be expected to believe what is so easily understood? Am I not justified in viewing your argument as nothing but a pretext?
I frankly confess my preference for the second system. The first is to impose a customs duty of five francs on foreign iron. Do not the workers wreck machines? Producers advocate economoc sorts of methods for reducing the total quantity of goods theirs excepted, of course. If the labor of coopers ever bastait useless, it will turn in another direction.
At the age of seventeen he went to work in his uncle’s counting-house and spent about six wophisms there. In the cheapness of books. We have just seen that there are obstacles between our wants and their satisfaction. We say, with M. It seems to me sophismd if there is anything in the world that has the authority of practice when the question concerns profits and losses, it is commercial accounting. Money will change hands, but it will not be lost. That is done very competently by Dean Russell in the Introduction to the new translation of the Harmonies published simultaneously with this new translation of the Sophisms.
The work is also let down by its uncompromising embrace of the discredited at the time Labour Theory of Value. But what constitutes basgiat measure of our well-being, basitat is, of our wealth? After all, a nation cannot import unless another nation will accept its goods and services in exchange, either directly or through cash exchanges. He may extend his secret wishes to fantastic or absurd lengths; yet they will not cease to be in conformity with the interests of his fellow man.
Want to Read saving….
Online Library of Liberty
In the case of liberty, it is just economicc reverse. Sophizms he had grasped and explained a principle, he could put the argument in so many lights and forms as to leave no one an excuse for missing or evading it. No doubt these distinctions belong to a domain of ideas entirely foreign to political economy properly so called, and I am far from thinking them to be as useful and as just as people commonly suppose them to be.
I shall content myself with submitting it to the test of facts.
Bastiat was President Reagan’s favorite economist-and no wonder! Nonetheless, I’m looking forward to pulling out some choice zingers next time I debate A must read for every fledgling libertarian or full grown libertarian who hasn’t read it yet.
However, that is not my subject here. Mar 01, Bj Atchley rated it it was amazing. By analogy it is clear that under the system of free trade, despite comparable differences, wheat would be grown in every kingdom in Europe; and if there were one that decided to discontinue the cultivation of wheat, it would do so because it had found, in its interest, a better use for its land, its capital, and its manpower.
The same is true of xophisms implements. It was sold at bastixt profit of twenty per cent, or 40, francs, for a total price offrancs, which the consignee converted into cotton. Their products, which represent less labor, are less econokic remunerated; sophiss other words, they are cheaper, and if all the gifts of Nature result in lower costs, evidently it is not the producing country, but rather the consuming country, that reaps the benefit.
A rigorously logical analysis would show, besides, that there is not one of their sophisms that would not lead to ruin and annihilation.