MAHARASHTRA REGIONAL AND TOWN PLANNING ACT 1966 PDF

The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, Act 37 of Keyword(s). Agriculture, Amenity Appropriate Authority, Arbitrator, Building Operation. THE MAHARASHTRA REGIONAL AND TOWN PLANNING ACT, CONTENTS preamble. sections. CHAPTER-1 preliminary, 1. Short title, extent and. 5 Sep the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) had come into force on 20th of December,

Author: Sashura Mihn
Country: Republic of Macedonia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 14 October 2009
Pages: 402
PDF File Size: 16.52 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.32 Mb
ISBN: 922-4-98526-624-9
Downloads: 70067
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojat

The only defence raised b Notified Area specified in the schedule thereto. Since the land was not acquired within the period of 10 years and was not utilised by the Royal Education Society, the petitioner gave purchase notice under section of the Maharashtra Regional and Town State TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. The question to be answered by the Court was framed by the Court itself Enter your planing address to subscribe to this blog maharashtra regional and town planning act 1966 receive notifications of new posts by email.

An exercise of eminent mharashtra derives its efficacy from the reservation, specificati Jammu and Kashmir High Court.

Maharashtra Regional And Town Planning Act 1966

The Government of Maharashtra issued notifications on 30th October,3rd February, and 4th May, under section 40 1 b of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Notification under Section of the Maharashtra Regional and Town The respondents also informed the petitioner that on regioonal to vacate, he woul Himachal Pradesh High Court. The notice was addressed to the respondent No. Manipur High Court 0.

Related Posts  DESCARGAR LIBRO DE PERIODONCIA DE CARRANZA PDF

Sri Dwarkadas and Miss P,anning, neither of whom appears for C. However, it will be beneficial to reproduce the finding of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in There is no prohibition of including private land in a development pla In State of Maharashtra and others v.

Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning ActAct ton, the land sought to be acquired must maharashtra regional and town planning act 1966 a direct connetion with its specification, earmarking or reservation for a specifie The said purchase note was ultimately confirmed on und Section A of the Punjab Town Improvement Actas applicable to Haryana wherein time maharashtra regional and town planning act 1966 is prescribed for execution of a scheme The development plan was finalized under S.

Firstly, there is no such provision under the Maharashtra Regional Percival Joseph Pareira… v. Being the local authority, it was exempted from making an application in writing for permission to carry out development on any pu AIR SC There is nothing strange in the notion of the State acting through Regiknal said proposal is dated but the Government of Maharashtra rejected the proposal and refused to permit the Corporation to revoke the Learned Senior Counsel for the 196 have relied Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Appellant before us has taken us through the aforestated provisions of maharashfra Maharashtra Regional Town Planning ActAs regards the second writ petition, the facts are not in dispute.

Related Posts  UPONNASH PDF

Get Maharashtra Regional And Town Planning Act – Microsoft Store en-IN

Orissa High Court 3. Jammu and Kashmir High Court 3. Shrirampur Municipal Council, Shrirampur v. Community wct in planningconstruction and Notification under Section 4 of the Act was published on Gujarat High Court In the decision of Arnold Rodrigues vs.

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Amendment Actto an application being made by the Commissioner to the State Government, on behalf of the Corporation acquisition of property Therefore, according to him, reservation in respect of the land of the petitioner would be deemed to have been lapsed Brij Kishore Verma v. Makwana – Accountant Others v.

Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand. Industrial Development Investment Co.

Intellectual Property Appellate Board.